Title I
Former Rural Trust Policy Director Marty Strange was recognized for outstanding research in the field of rural education.
U.S. House Education and Workforce Committee does not advance All Children are Equal Act, but important groundwork was laid to move ahead.
The House Education and Workforce Committee will be considering adoption of the ACE Act on February 28...
Why Rural Matters 2011–12 is the sixth in a series of biennial reports analyzing the contexts and conditions of rural education in each of the 50 states and calling attention to the need for policymakers to address rural education issues in their respective states.
Date:
January 10, 2012
Related Categories:
Administrator,
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Media,
Networks/Groups,
Parent,
Policy Maker,
Policy Services,
Publications,
Resource Center,
Rural Trust Recommends,
State/Region,
Student,
Teacher,
What's New
Related Tags:
All States,
Assessing Student Work,
Consolidation,
Distance Learning,
Education Policy and Activism,
Educational Technology,
English Language Learners (ELL),
Income Related Issues,
K-12,
PDF,
Report,
RT Policy Department,
Rural Trust Publication,
School Finance/Funding,
School/District Size,
Small Schools/School Size,
Teacher Issues,
Title I,
Why Rural Matters,
Youth
Nearly one in four American children attend rural schools and enrollment is growing at a faster rate in rural school districts than in all other places combined, according to
Why Rural Matters 2011–12, a biennial report by the Rural School and Community Trust.
Date:
January 10, 2012
Related Categories:
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Media,
Networks/Groups,
Policy Maker,
Policy Services,
Publications
Related Tags:
All States,
Assessing Student Work,
Consolidation,
Distance Learning,
Education Policy and Activism,
Educational Technology,
English Language Learners (ELL),
Income Related Issues,
K-12,
Report,
RT Policy Department,
Rural Trust Publication,
School Finance/Funding,
School/District Size,
Small Schools/School Size,
Teacher Issues,
Title I,
Why Rural Matters
The bill to end discrimination in the way Title I funding is distributed has gained two more sponsors, continues to attract attention
A recent report from the U.S. Department of Education finds that many school districts spend less state and local funds per-pupil in their Title I and highest-poverty schools than in schools with lower rates of student poverty.
The ACE act to end discrimination against most high-poverty districts in Title I funding is at an important juncture. Congressional Representatives need to hear from their constituents that this bill is critical.
Don’t miss commentary by Marty Strange, Rural Trust Policy Director, in Education Week.
Date:
September 28, 2011
Related Categories:
Administrator,
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Networks/Groups,
Parent,
Policy Maker,
Rural Policy Matters,
Rural Trust Recommends,
Teacher
Related Tags:
Education Policy and Activism,
Federal Education Policy,
Formula Fairness Campaign,
Poverty,
Title I
Both the All Children are Equal Act and the Formula Fairness Campaign have new co-sponsors.
A bill introduced this month in the U.S. House of Representatives aims to alter the Title I formulas that are unfair to students in poorer, smaller school districts.
A new bill would amend the Title I law to require school districts to spend as much on the education of students in high-poverty schools as it does on students in low-poverty schools.
The All Children are Equal (ACE) Act was introduced July 12 in the U.S. House of Representatives by 11 original co-sponsors led by Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA).
Date:
July 14, 2011
Related Categories:
Administrator,
Community Advocate,
Elected Official/Staff,
Media,
Networks/Groups,
Policy Maker,
Student,
Teacher,
What's New
Related Tags:
Education Policy and Activism,
Federal Education Policy,
Federal Policy,
Formula Fairness Campaign,
Title I
A bill that deals with the impact of number weighting in the Title I formulas has been drafted in the U.S. Congress. The Formula Fairness Campaign gains momentum.
Number-weighting in the Title I formulas is so detrimental to most high-poverty districts that many would be better off if the formulas made no attempt to target more money to districts with high rates of poverty. This post from the
Formula Fairness Campaign explains why.
Pages: