
Last Updated: March 26, 2010
Editor's note: Links are free and current at time of posting, but may require registration or expire over time.
Meanwhile, the Associated School Boards of South Dakota, (ASBSD), filed a “friend of the court” brief with the state Supreme Court supporting the plaintiff’s case. The brief states that trial Judge Lori Wilbur “disregarded the plight of disadvantaged students and poor school districts" struggling to educate “without appropriate programs, services, and facilities” in her decision. According to Wilbur’s interpretation, the South Dakota Constitution does not specifically require a “quality” education. During the trial evidence was presented that schools are unable to offer needed coursework, hire teachers, or repair or build new facilities, but Judge Wilbur did not find district superintendents’ testimony credible. (You can read more coverage of the decision from RSFN here: http://www.ruraledu.org/articles.php?id=2185.)
The funding situation will not improve even modestly for schools in the next fiscal year as previously anticipated. The legislature has approved a measure overriding current state law that requires a yearly increase in per-pupil funding. South Dakota schools are supposed to receive an increase at least in the amount of the rate of inflation, up to a maximum of 3%. This zero-increase is also supported by Governor Mike Rounds.
Coverage on the resolution to stop the lawsuit:
Read more from the March 2010 Rural Policy Matters.