
SIGN IN

FORGOT PASSWORD
Rural Policy Matters: December 2009
Last Updated: December 30, 2009
Question: What percentage of students in rural schools attends a school that is in a non-rural district?
New analysis of the effects of “number-weighting” in the Title I formulas demonstrate that very low poverty large districts are big winners, getting more money per poor student than very high poverty large districts. Smaller very poor districts lose vital support for the most vulnerable student to large high and low poverty districts because of the effects of the formula...
New guidelines for Race to the Top applications are slightly better for rural schools...
RPM provides a brief interpretation of the 19 criteria on which RTTT awards points to state grant proposals...
High-poverty districts with low graduation rates in the southwestern and southeastern United States tend to enroll high percentages of minority students...
State and regional education news...
Changes to the state’s funding formula will cause cuts to state education funding to hit Nebraska’s rural districts hard...
Decreases in state funding and unequal impact on low-income and minority students are the basis of claims against the Sunshine State...
Eleven states have especially high numbers of rural students. Together these students represent much of the rural diversity characteristic of the nation as a whole: areas of extreme poverty, racial/ethnic diversity, a variety of economic bases, and a range of school and district configurations.
Increasing college-going rates, especially among low-income and first-generation students, is widely cited as necessary for improving life prospects of young people and building the nation’s economic future. A September report from the Institute of Education Sciences reviews the research and makes recommendations on how schools can help more students prepare for and enter college. We summarize those recommendations and note adaptations needed for rural schools, especially those that are isolated and/or high-poverty...